The photo is of Roz Ward who is a Project Coordinator: Roz Ward (pronouns: they/Roz) for the safe school coalition in Australia. You’ll notice that you cannot refer to Ward as a she. Her preferred pronoun is they. Apparently she is a multiple, perhaps in her number of personalities.
The safe school coalition’s purpose is to:
“… equip staff and students with skills, practical ideas and greater confidence to lead positive change and be safe and inclusive for same sex attracted, intersex and gender diverse students, staff and families …”
Strange. I would have thought safe schools meant that some bully didn’t smash your face in on the playground or a teacher didn’t invite you into her office for some extra special attention.
According to The Australian newspaper, (pay-walled) Ms Ward is a bit of a naughty Marxist:
“… Ms Ward oversees youth-orientated projects at Gay and Lesbian Health Victoria, which gets $315,000 a year from the state government.
Railing against a “push to fit people into gender constructs that promote heterosexuality’’ at a Marxist conference in Melbourne last year, she alluded that Safe Schools was part of a broader strategy to change society.
“Programs like the Safe Schools Coalition are making some difference but we’re still a long way from liberation,’’ she said. “Marxism offers the hope and the strategy needed to create a world where human sexuality, gender and how we relate to our bodies can blossom in extraordinarily new and amazing ways that we can only try to imagine today.”
So she is against gender constructs that promote heterosexuality. That must mean she is for gender constructs that promote homosexuality. But why could that be? Then I read this piece at The Real McCain where he quotes from a feminist book titled, Anticlimax: A feminist perspective on the sexual revolution. I will quote the same section as it is highly relevant:
“… The demolition of heterosexual desire is a necessary step on the route to women’s liberation. . . . Male-supremacist sexuality is constructed from the subordination of women. . . .
The feminist fight against male violence requires the reconstruction of male sexuality. . . .
Male sexuality must be reconstructed to sever the link between power and aggression and sexual pleasure. . . . Men’s pleasure in women’s subordination is a powerful bulwark in their resistance to women’s liberation. . . .
As women and as lesbians our hope lies only in other women. We must work towards the construction of homosexual desire and practice as a most important part of our struggle for liberation. . . .
Heterosexuality is the institution through which male-supremacist society is organized and as such it must cease to function …”
Here is another excerpt from the piece at The Australian:
“… Parts of the program have come under fire from conservatives who argue that it pushes a leftist ideological agenda and transcends its pursuit to reduce bullying of gay and transgender students. It has been criticised for promoting a politically correct approach to sex education, with teachers told not to refer to students as “boys and girls”, as the terms are “heterosexist”, and pupils as young as 11 encouraged to role-play as gay teenagers …”
11 year old’s encouraged to role-play as gay teenagers by a committed Marxist who is dedicated to the demolition of heterosexual desire. To date the coalition is running in 526 schools, has ‘trained’, (indoctrinated), 15,102 teachers, and has reached 403, 392 students. It has been provided with $8 million in funds by the Federal government.
There is an argument known as the ‘slippery slope argument’. Its premise is that if allowance or accommodation is made in one area then it will be a slippery slope to most unwanted outcomes. This argument is routinely shouted down by those of the hard left precisely because of the fact that it is true. The push for marriage equality is merely a smokescreen for committed feminist Marxists to destroy the nuclear family and remodel it in their own image. They are using homosexuals to further their own political agenda. And they are indoctrinating children with funding from the government.
You couldn’t make this shit up.