Welcome to the smorgasbord of delights that infest the innermost recesses of the Friday hawt chicks & links thread. The infestastion levels are very high indeed this week. There’s more infestation here than in a two day funeral celebration in Madagascar. More infestation than at a hairdresser who specializes in blue hair dye. More infestation than in the fat folds of Triggly Puff’s arms.
I have a hell of a lot of links this week. So much has caught my eye. So much is happening as 2017 ramps up to its awesome conclusion. And let us not forget that this week marked the first anniversary of the Trump victory and the cries of socialist rage that echoed around the world. It’s an exciting time to be alive.
Why the gun is civilization. Probably the best argument I have ever read about why guns are good.
People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.
Taylor’s restaurant is not alone. Earlier this year, a North Carolina restaurant owner took a similar action. The final straw was when staff could not persuade a little girl’s parents to turn down the volume on her iPad.
And these establishments are not the only ones that have wrestled with out-of-control children. As the Tampa Bay Times goes on to explain, other restaurants have had to post clear rules regarding children’s behavior so they can point them out to parents when children need to toe the line. The reason for this, one restaurant worker noted, is clear: “I think there’s been a big shift in how people are comfortable disciplining their children, especially in public.”
I agree with the restaurants but at the same time I also feel for the parents. In this sense the article did not nearly go far enough. Just what are the legal ramifications for properly disciplining your child in places like the USA? There is no doubt that many parents are simply doucebags who don’t give a crap either way what misery their “little darlings” inflict upon the rest of us. But at the same time there will undoubtedly be a proportion of parents that are terrified that if they do publicly discipline their child then someone will call the police and social workers with a report of supposed child abuse.
Ad-pocalypse on Youtube.
But also, what did YouTube just do? It just basically told all amateur content creators to hump off. They just homogenized all content. They just did a Hollywood, compressing several decades of moving towards mediocrity into mere months. They signed their death warrant in exchange for a bit longer being paid to exist. It screwed all its customers and suppliers. Granted, most videos are drek and unworthy of being watched. But that choice should be up to us the viewers rather than the company.
I have actually been considering doing videos as so many people have asked me to. Can’t really see the point now. As always, I’m last on the train when there’s no more gravy to eat. Figures.
This week’s awesome Woodpile Report where I sourced a few links.
Are you at all interested in what Africans are like to work with on a daily basis? Have you ever made any arguments stating that people are individuals and race really has nothing to do with it, (looking at you, Mark). Then this documentary is for you. Bonus awesome based Chinese guy.
Trailer to whet your appetite.
Full film available at time of posting.
Stanford University professor Mark Z. Jacobson has filed a lawsuit, demanding $10 million in damages, against the peer-reviewed scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) [link to published paper] and a group of eminent scientists (Clack et al.) for their study showing that Jacobson made improper assumptions in order to claim that he had demonstrated U.S. energy could be provided exclusively by renewable energy, primarily wind, water, and solar.
The left have succeeded in destroying science.
The National Post reports the incident at the Halifax Pop Explosion began when singer Lido Pimienta called for “brown girls to the front” of the venue. According to an account of the event by Allie O’Manique that was confirmed by a festival spokesman, Pimienta kept repeating, “Move to the back” when a white volunteer photographer refused to move.
“Finally after saying it about 10 times — and the woman refused to move — (Pimienta) said, ‘You’re cutting into my set time and you’re disrespecting these women, and I don’t have time for this,’” she explained.
The volunteer was ultimately removed from the event after refusing to move.
Just another example of the inverse-double-backwards black racism. But blacks can’t be racist, right?
Now, as to why this is not “a hoax,” and why we must stop using that word:
Why does someone write a real bit of hate-graffiti? For these reasons:
1. To threaten/worry a racial minority.
2. To stir up racial divisions.
3. To encourage others to express their own racial hatreds (for minorities).
Now, why does a member of a minority group write hate-graffiti?
1. To threaten/worry a racial minority.
2. To stir up racial divisions.
3. To encourage others to express their own racial hatreds (for the group presumed responsible for the graffiti, usually straight white Christian men).
Now, notice that in both cases, the motivations and the intent and the act and even the very words used are precisely the same.
So why is the same sort of hatred written by a white person treated a hate crime — all prosecutorial tools deployed, minor crimes like vandalism pushed to the hilt, even possible charges of intent to make terroristic threats added — and the hate graffiti, when written by a not-white, though with the exact same intentions of making minorities fear for their safety, stirring up racial divisions, and directing hatred and contempt at one racial group — treated as mere mischief?
Why is that if a white guy had written this, we’d know his name and know the criminal charges against him, but now that it’s revealed a black guy wrote the hate message with the same intent to cause fear and hatred, his name is concealed, details are withheld, no chargers are tendered, and he’s merely asked to leave the school (which, based on this article, it seems like he was being asked to leave anyway)?
Very good questions indeed from Ace. Keep ‘er movin’.
Affirmative action is an inescapably real and racist as segregated water fountains.
Affirmative action is racial discrimination, not as a matter of opinion, but as a hard objective fact. Racial preferences reward and punish people based on their race. These preferences, no matter how they are disguised, pervade not just one region, the way that segregation did, but much of the country. Diversity is a mandate on campuses and in corporations across the country. And it’s the very definition of racism.
Continuing on with the theme that white people are being actively persecuted around the world, let me take you to the living hellhole that is South Africa.
ANC has sanctioned a chant, which goes “one bullet, one white infant.” Ncobo Sodo and Mfundo Dlungwane, both ANC government officials, are still in their posts openly calling for a genocide of white babies. What follows is taken from their Facebook accounts:
“We kill the white babies, when the rite time comes we chop their heads off, so they become headless little racists.”
I’ll end this week with something about the Bolshevik revolution. After all, it was 100 years ago this week that the Russians entered an extremely long and horrible period of suffering.
There is a lot of overlap among the phases, but I think they can be roughly identified as: 1.) Laying the groundwork; 2.) Propaganda; 3.) Agitation; 4.) State takeover of society’s institutions; 5.) Coercing conformity; and 6.) Final solutions. But first let’s look a bit more closely at what communism really means for human beings.
The Anglo-Saxon world is currently at step 5 – Coercing conformity.
Austria recently elected a far-right leader to steer them back to normality. To celebrate this auspicious occasion, I give you a lovely Austrian girl as the hawt chick of the week.