Male anti-violence is the latest “shut up!”

Mark Steyn has described how freedom of speech is being shut down under the guise of making us all safe. It would be nice if we could listen to speakers that the left has deemed inappropriate, but the threat of violence against all those involved makes this rather unpalatable.

Nice little Festival Hall you’ve got there. Shame if anything were to happen to it.

In a similar vein, efforts to rid boys of their pesky and inconvenient masculinity all fall under the guise of promoting “anti-violence”. The propaganda states that men and boys are naturally violent and awful creatures and they must be taught to be nice young girls with dicks.

Courtesy of the Australian government, a conservative government mind you, we now have the unmitigated joy of benefiting from what they refer to as an excuse interpreter which has been released by the Council of Australian Governments’ Stop it at the Start campaign.

The Stop It At The Start campaign is the latest to link gender inequality, traditional gender norms and disrespect with violence against women … A language guide designed to expose­ “hidden meanings” behind common expressions such as “boys will be boys”, “she’s a little princess” and “it takes two to tango” is the latest weapon in the multi-million-dollar war on violenc­e against women.

And just who will be perpetrating this awful violence against the wymens?

hmmm … it looks like the nasty violent males are white while the poor oppressed wymens are culture-enrichers. What a surprise.

Lets check out the list of “common expressions which can cause disrespectful behaviour to girls”.

Just so you know who is behind this “the campaign was developed by the Department of Social Services in consultation with parenting­ experts, child psychologists, a behavioural change ­expert, the Department of Education and other experts.” In other words, we got lots and lots of experts so it must be good!

My personal favorite has to be the “you’re so whipped” explanation. Apparently if young men do not cater to every random need and desire from their special snowflake princess girlfriends then they are perpetuating male violence against women. I wonder how that would work if she wants her boyfriend to beat up all his ex-girlfriends? Tricky stuff this social engineering.

Yes, I know this is all ridiculous, and I know we should just laugh it off and ignore it, but it is another layer on a layer cake of social control and conformity with a basis in feminist Marxist brainwashing. Our government wants to control what we eat, what we do with our bodies, how we live our lives, what we say around the kitchen table, and ultimately how we think, something that a chap called Orwell warned us about some time ago. This is an attempt to transform society through social manipulation the likes of which the world hasn’t seen since Mao’s China.

White men are seen and portrayed as the enemy and the latest attempt to silence them is to re-frame their every underlying motivation as originating from violent intent. It’s the kind of deliberate mischaracterization that makes me want to go out and start cracking some useless academic heads. This isn’t just an attack on free speech. It is an attack on the free speech of one segment of the population. The segment that stormed the beaches at Gallipoli, that stopped the Japanese on the Kokoda Trail, and that then came home and continued to build this country.

ANZAC Day is fast approaching and while we stand there in our thousands at the dawn services around the country we would do well to remember that we are remembering white men who saved this country by being men, not by being emasculated she-men, browbeaten into submission by social engineering. That men are capable of violence is our supreme burden because one day we may be called to unleash those demons in defense of our country, and in defense of our women. They would do well to remember that.

Two Australian soldiers on the Kokoda Trail. Boys will be boys.

 

 

13 thoughts on “Male anti-violence is the latest “shut up!”

  1. Dan Flynn

    Violence is appropriate during war or when protecting someone you care about.
    Violence is not an appropriate way to solve an argument with your wife or girlfriend. Some men need to learn this. This is why the ads are made. It’s not a conspiracy to control your mind. It’s just trying to get boys to stop hitting girls. It’s not that complicated.

    Like

  2. Poor little Daniel above . Like a lot of wimp excuses for men he just doesn’t get it. He wants social control of thought and attitude, but we are going to fight it all along the way Daniel pussy till we thrash it. As soon as you read that word :i>appropriate from these little darlings you know the societal control mindset is there , and in fact it is these sad stand over control freaks which are showing the most violence so far.
    Thank God we have people like Adam, in print, who refuse to be overrun by the fascist girl boy free speech silencers

    Like

    1. Dan Flynn

      Take a breathe Paul, I’m also supportive of free speech. I feel we can have both. Free speech with less violence. They don’t need to be mutually exclusive.

      Dan Flynn and the ‘fascist girl boy free speech silencers’

      That could be my next band!

      Like

  3. Dan, you originally began commenting on my site and talking with me because you expressed a desire to better understand and communicate with the alt-right. As such I gave you a fair amount of my time. But of late you are simply trolling. You have done this time and again. You are offering nothing of value except to betray your own prejudices. If you want to continue commenting here then you will have to return to your earlier expressed position. If not then you are not welcome.

    Like

  4. LadyMoonlight

    “…while we stand there in our thousands at the dawn services around the country we would do well to remember that we are remembering white men who saved this country by being men, not by being emasculated she-men, browbeaten into submission by social engineering.”

    YES! YES! Absolute truth.

    Like

  5. They don’t need men to be tough? I would have never have guessed that anyone equates toughness with violence.

    I guess perseverance and patience are poor attributes for men to cultivate. Who needs that crop to be brought in after all. Milk and honey, from heaven, that’s the ticket.

    I swear it’s all magic for these people. No one has to actually do anything, it just appears.

    Like

  6. Speaking about violence against white men, did you read about this?

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/04/10/australian-beaten-cross-beaten-muslim-gang-shouting/

    These “men of color” beat down this Orthodox Greek  guy on a train for the unspeakable “crime” of wearing a cross.

    And your cucked “Transit Police” stood by to give these muzloid bastards a “safe space”. (Oh my, did I just violate your 18-C?)

    Wonder what your new thought police would have to say about this one…

    Like

  7. wranglethat

    This one, ‘He picks on you because he likes you’ and the message to boys is it’s OK to do it if you like them … do what, exactly? Bang her on the head with a club? Call her names? Display indifference, or even boredom with her snowflake behaviour? Snowflakes find rejection to be male violence too, you know. I do not know nor have ever seen a man ‘insult’ a woman because he likes her. Depends on her definition of ‘insult’, doesn’t it. This stuff is horrible, streams of it joining up to form torrents.
    Yes, Anzac Day is coming up. I’m a little surprised at the low-key (compared to some recent years) anti-masculinity, so far …
    I’m a research historian working on the WA dead from the Western Front. The Pingelly Soldiers’ Memorial bears the names of 70 men and boys who died on active service from just that one little district. It’s a microcosm of our irreparable loss a hundred years ago. Now our so-called representatives in government are funding and promoting this social engineering. They fund it with our money so these toerags can in return lobby them, and suddenly it’s government policy. I feel beaten down by all this sometimes.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s