On the one hand the terrorist attack in Manchester can be dismissed as just another outrage in the countless outrages to which we have been witness over the last two decades. But it is unique in that the cowardly loser behind the attack specifically targeted young women and girls. I’m not sure that he will be able to be quite as successful a pin-up boy for future terrorist recruitment as previous dim-witted ex-goat herders have proven to be.
But it has also hit a visceral nerve. Men are supposed to be able to protect their women and children, the same women incidentally who are the first to participate in candlelit vigils, supportive hashtag outbursts, and marches for universal peace and togetherness, whatever that means.
As I wrote last year, the mass rape attacks in Cologne on New Years Eve were an indirect attack on men. The perpetrators were taunting Western men by demonstrating that they are unable to protect their women from the invasion of the culture enrichers. But it is not fear of combat that paralyzes Western men; they are handicapped into inaction by their own governments who are heavily invested in protecting the status quo.
Regular commenter Brandon wrote an insightful comment on yesterday’s post:
I’ve realised that when the apologists say “They will not divide us.” The “They” they are referring to is not the murdering spawn of Satan.
No, the “they” are us. Those who want ever terrorist tracked down and….
The unity they do not want broken is the Labour Party and it’s Muslim block vote, the Marxists and there Islamist coalition, the Liberals and their free movement of terrorists, and the Cuckservative Party and their infatuation with diversity, foreign skilled and unskilled labour.
To the government the enemy is not the terrorists. The enemy is the general population. The thousands of extra police on British streets today and the military being deployed are not just there to stop future terrorist attacks. They are present to stop the populace from taking matters into their own hands. It took the killing of young women and girls for the government to finally act in this way because the ruling powers know that such an attack has the best possible chance of causing a docile public to rouse itself from in front of the football on the television and go out seeking retribution for what seems like an endless series of outrages.
As Tim Newman notes the people may well begin to see the forces of law and order as the enemy if those same forces are seen to be protecting the Muslim invaders.
The first sign of things going badly wrong in Britain might not be a mob firebombing a mosque but a policeman or judge winding up in a ditch, throat cut, with a note stuffed in his pocket.
This is what the authorities are worried about, not little girls getting decimated by nail bombs at concerts. And this tactic was used in the troubles in Northern Ireland.
Likewise the progressive white shitlibs are heavily invested in promoting Islam, as this aids them in their goal of smothering Western civilization with their toxic ideology. So when the chant goes up of ‘they will not divide us’ what they actually mean is that they will not allow their fellow citizens to stand up to the invaders. By not being divided it means that we remain unified, and the unification is a complete adherence to the multicultural agenda in spite of all evidence to the bed of lies on which it rests.
Western civilization presently faces three enemies; the third world invaders, our own governments, and progressive shitlibs. Each needs to be dealt with in different ways but the overriding message is that they need to be dealt with. This isn’t going to be solved by toeing the acceptable line.
For the invaders, nothing short of expulsion back to their own countries will suffice. France expelled every German out of Alsace and Lorraine at the end of the Second World War. Some German families had been there since 1870. They were given a day’s notice and allowed to carry one suitcase each that could not weigh more than 60kg. Czechoslovakia did the same. There are countless other examples from history. It can and will be done.
For the progressive shitlibs who undermine our nations from within there needs to be another tactic. They are Quislings intent on our own destruction. In other words they are collaborators with the enemy. From the Roosh V forum, (unfortunately I don’t have a link), came this comment:
Seeing those tweets from DarrenB rekindled a memory that only just fully formed.
All such tweets like DarrenB’s should be simply retweeted by patriots with the addition of #collaborator.
No need for explanations or reasoning to clutter the message and dull the accusation. It’s one thing to get 1000 retweets telling you to drop dead, go to hell, fuck off, suck a dick etc.
It’s entirely more chilling to get 1000 retweets that just say #collaborator. That sends a message that patriots are not a ramshackle pack of drunken hooligans but a very pissed off and typically silent majority of professionals that are beginning to recognise traitors and mark them for future justice.
Beyond that, it’s impossible to thought-police and doesn’t qualify as a threat. It’s also fanciful to attack one person for saying the exact same thing as 999 other people.
Imagine some globocuck celebrity’s feed filled with nothing but #collaborator.
How the hell could the media handle that?
It’s not just the media that would have a massive problem spinning this, and particularly if it is the journalists themselves who are receiving these messages. The government will have a real problem on its hands as well.
And that would take care of the third enemy.