Comment of the week goes to Hans who made an observation on this week’s hawt chick.
Hawt chick: Nah…. arms too long and she has that passé smirky superior model expression.
Why is she hiding her feet ? Are they deformed ? Shoulders too bony.
Right hand looks deformed. Looks like she has no tappet clearance. (aka box gap)
Neck is too long and masculine. That stomach too flat…is she anorexic or bulimic ?
Get the girl a burger and fries.
Apart from that, I guess she is ok. 4/10
But, Jesus, she looks uncomfortable, lying upside down like that.
It is always vital for the modern man to be adept at successfully identifying a woman’s salient features in order to comfortably predict how she will look twenty years into the future. For example, Courtney Cox in a Bruce Springsteen video:
lucky the drummer has both hands on it …
Courtney Cox on a recent episode of Bear Gryll’s show:
dress rehearsal for her forthcoming part as the wicked witch of the west …
Of course, Courtney’s dramatic transformation could be laid at the feet of plastic surgery. Girls, there is a good reason why everyone who gets serious plastic surgery ends up looking the same – these guys aren’t Rembrandt. But it is also a timely lesson that she was never going to end up in a good place. I watched Friends; there I admit it. And I was always under the impression that while her female co-stars were likely to age well, Cox was on a hiding to nothing. Now all she looks good for is stirring a pot while cursing Macbeth.
But as far as Hans vote of a 4 out of 10 for this week’s hawtness, all I can surmise from this is that my readership is the ghey. The only thing worse than this would be deliberately marrying the boss’s daughter.
(Also, I checked with the Good Wife before posting the hawt chick as to get her opinion on the veracity of the boobs. Her eventual opinion was indecisive, prompting me to immediately declare them real as it is only jealously that propels a woman to identify the bleeding obvious.)