Adam Piggott

Gentleman adventurer

Scouts Australia began admitting girls in 1971.

The news that the Boy Scouts of America have unanimously decided to begin admitting girls into the organisation from 2018 has been repeatedly described as being an historic decision. Particularly surprising is the use of this term by Australian media because the decision is not historic within the scouting movement at all. Scouting Australia began admitting girls in 1971, which coincidentally was the high water mark  for membership numbers. It’s all been downhill since then.

(So much for recruiting girls being a way to halt membership decline.)

Over at Ace of Spades, Ace expressed dismay at the decision but retained some hope of things not being all bad:

This isn’t as bad as it may seem. While the Scouts will admit girls, each particular den will be all-boys or all-girls. (Or mostly; I assume there will be whatever-gender-you-identify-as-this-month caveat.)

One only has to look at the state of Scouting Australia to be able to peer into the future to catch a glimpse of what awaits the scouting movement in the USA. Unfortunately for Ace, his optimism is unfounded.

Here is a video from The Australian Boy Scouts Association. The film was made in 1971, the same year that the scouts not only began admitting girls but also changed its name to The Scout Association of Australia, which is kind of a prerequisite if you plan to admit girls. Note the high level of discipline, formality, group ethos, companionship, and actual team work.

The seeds for the association’s demise, however are prevalent in the film. Note the number of women involved in the behind the scenes aspect of the association. There can be little doubt as to where the push to admit girls originated.

Contrast this film with one produced by Scouts Australia in 2012, (lots of name changing goes on when an organisation strays so far from its original concept).

Girls are in substantial numbers in this particular troop. There is no division between a scout troop being all girls or boys as Ace hopes will occur in the USA. The extra manpower and facilities required to make such a proposition function will be quickly used as an excuse to merge the two sexes, as was done in Australia.

But what is particularly evident in the film is the lack of any type of discipline, formality, ritual, or leadership. The two films may as well show two completely different organisations that have nothing to do with one another. Gone is the pride of being in a scout group. The scout leader doesn’t even wear the scout uniform himself when meeting with his troop, let alone require his charges to wear it.

In the film there are flashbacks to when the troop had an “uncool” leader. These flashbacks show the troop in uniform. The present day shots are of the troop without the uniform. The inference is that the uniform itself is not cool or even necessary. The old leader is shown being incapable of understanding the very basics of the scouting ethos. It seems to be lost on the filmmakers that such an individual would have had to have been approved by the organisation itself, thus making Scouts Australia complicit in appointing substandard troop leaders.

If you think that the film is not indicative of the general malaise, a simple glance at the website of Scouts Australia should suffice to reassure you the that rot is deep and far reaching. The prominent photo on the home page is the following, an advertisement for the scout shop.

four scouts in attendance, one of which is a boy.

In the USA scouts can remain with the organisation in a membership role until the age of 20. In Australia the age has been extended to 25. Perhaps in the future scouts will be octogenarians. There is a good reason why the age is being steadily increased, and it is not just to compensate for the rapidly declining membership.

The Boy Scouts used to be a significant rite of passage for males in a modern society that had seen a decline in such opportunities due to the rise in general living standards. But now with its complete perversion by progressive doctrine and the feminine imperative, the scouting movement no longer offers such a rite of passage. In fact, one could even argue that it achieves the opposite: it infantilises boys.

(To understand just how much SJW progressivism has infected the movement, Scouts Australia recently released a new policy requiring scout leaders to treat members by their preferred gender. This means that a boy can simply declare that he is a girl, not have to wear a dress or anything, and he gets to sleep in the girl’s tent.)

The second video shows a scout troop leader completely divorced of being able to show any leadership or guidance for boys to be able to transition into the role of young men. A decision to ban smoking is taken by the troop themselves without any input from their supposed leader. While the more innocent of you may well surmise that this is a fine example of empowering youngsters to come to their own decisions, it is the process itself which is disturbing. The issue of smoking today is unfortunately one without any grey area; it is an exceptionally simple decision.

But just because young people are able to make a correct decision in such a clear and easy example  does not mean that they will be similarly successful in areas that are not so clearly defined. The scout leader does not even get to decide on a suitable punishment for breaking this new rule. The kids themselves decide, (a girl, of course), who then corrects the adult troop leader when he suggests an unsuitable method of communicating the punishment.

In other words, the leadership of the troop has been completely inverted, which ultimately means that there is no leadership at all.

The first video from 1971 ends with a scene of an enormous scout meeting somewhere in Australia. A speech is made and at the end the scouts celebrate by cheering and throwing aloft their hats. The camera pans over the large crowd of scout members as the sun begins to set on the day. The majority of those members did not know or understand just how badly their own leadership was at that moment failing the very organisation whose charge they had been entrusted with.

This is what awaits the scouting movement in the USA. An organisation betrayed and hollowed out from the inside, a shabby reminder of what once was, and ultimately a clear embarrassment to everyone concerned. But more than that; a failure of boys and our future men.



Pretend woman attempts to join pretend competition.


Podcast #60 – The white men episode.


  1. Fortunately I was able to teach my boys myself about the outdoors, and they got more out of it as well. I still laugh about one aspect of it though, my wife’s input. Before the first trip into the wilderness my wife said only one thing about it to me. “Bring my boys home safely or come home being carried.” Quite Spartan of the woman. The great thing about the wilderness is that boys learn that it is indifferent to them and might actually kill them if they are unwary. Good prep for life.

    People who want girls to be admitted to Scouting seem to be completely ignorant and indifferent to the fact that male bonding comes through shared hardship, and competitiveness. I don’t think they have the slightest clue that male bonding is one of the very reasons our species survives the crucible of evolution.

  2. BWV

    Like most things damaging Western civilization this is aimed at preventing boys from becoming men. If you dig far enough back into who influenced this change, I suspect you will find “The Chosen” working behind the scenes.

  3. Susie P

    What I don’t understand is why no one has ever challenged Feminists on why they don’t fight to make the Girl Scouts of America into something more desirable. They purport to like the Boy Scouts more rustic, camping, real life oriented skills.

    Fair enough. Then tell the GSA that. Why abandon an organization that was founded by a feminist back in the day?

    Now we all know the answer is because they are simply trying to destroy the Boy Scouts of America, because it is considered a “Patriarchal” organization. They don’t want girls involved, they want it gone. But why don’t we push them? Make them answer (or refuse to answer) the damn question.

    Especially when you consider that the GSA is exactly what Feminists want a girls organization to be: one that spends most of its time preaching the gospel of Planned Parenthood to little girls. I’m sure Feminists are in knots trying to figure out how to take down the cookie empire. After all, girls and cookies is probably triggering to them.

    This comment was a bit of a stream of consciousness rant–sorry!

    • Adam

      I always approve of stream of consciousness rants.

  4. Adam

    I have had some experience with cub/scouts in Australia. My take is that the sporty boys play footy & basketball and some of the non-sporty join scouts. Two of mine (girl & boy) joined. Female teachers ran it with the male leaders standing sternly & quietly, for the most part, beside them. It is a mixed bunch that get involved with the movement. Some slightly weird leaders too.

    Boys need something of their own as a right of passage to make that transition, with their kind, into manhood. Women need to get their meddling noses out & leave them to it. Women have taken down scouts and are in the process of taking down football. Thankfully there are still many men involved in running boy’s footy; my husband included.

  5. Carl-Edward

    The abysmal ignorance behind this, reflects the general decline of Western civilisation. I think this now corrupt organisation must be dissolved. I shall, nevertheless, miss Girl Scout cookies.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

%d bloggers like this: