Adam Piggott

Gentleman adventurer

Australia votes for state sanctioned sodomy.

The results of the Australian gay marriage survey are in and the Yes vote won with just over 61% of the adult population who bothered to send in their choice voting in the affirmative. The next step will be for this to go before parliament where legislation will be drafted to amend the marriage act to officially allow those people in the community who have chosen a homosexual lifestyle the ability to get married.

In other words, Australians have freely chosen state sanctioned sodomy.

I was under no illusion that the No vote would win. I wrote a couple of articles supporting the No vote a few months ago but I really only did it for the sake of form. There was a good reason why I left Australia and it was the direction that the wind was blowing: towards the putrefaction of our society.

I did find the celebration in the streets from the Yes camp to be highly amusing. Remember that these were the same people who bitterly opposed allowing Australians to have their say on this matter for the nebulous reason of hate. Also, I distinctly recall their warning that having such a survey would result in scores of homos topping themselves in despair. Do we have an official sodomite suicide count for this period? No? I didn’t think so. Funny that.

So what will change when the homos are allowed to officially tie the knot? In a legal sense nothing at all; homosexual couples already have all of the legal rights that married heterosexual couples enjoy. It has been this way for some time. It is also no longer a privilege to be married. A married couple enjoy no extra benefits as compared to defacto couples. This is part of the reason for all the trouble that we are in.

With state endorsed sodomy the first thing that will change will be the sudden increase of ordinary people being prosecuted for wrong-think. This will coincide with a reduction of religious freedoms for any religion that does not begin with the letter I.

We will also have the situation where homosexuality will be promoted as a viable and healthy alternative to being a square and shacking up with someone of the opposite sex. State sanctioned sodomy means equivocating that homosexuality is the moral equal to heterosexuality.

Where will this be taught? In schools, dear friends. In schools. The last 40 years have already been confusing enough for all the little tikes out there. What with fault free divorce, and divorce not affecting children, and mummy has another boyfriend now, and over 40% of children being born out of wedlock, and daddy is an evil vile monster who must and will be punished by the courts for the crime of continuing to exist after being told to stop by his wife; we will now have a bunch of new challenges to add for all the kiddies to grapple with.

Specifically the kiddies will be taught that growing up and marrying someone of your own sex is just as healthy and happy and wonderful as marrying someone of the opposite sex. This will happen without fail because of the other nebulous progressive argument which is love. So for all of you parents and future parents, be prepared for little Johnny to be taught from a young age that he can choose to marry little Tommy when he grows up if he wants and that nobody will think bad of him.

Homosexuality is and always has been a choice. You choose to be a sodomite. Or in the case of future Australian schooling, you will be taught and even encouraged to be a sodomite. Or brainwashed to be a sodomite.

The other little hurdle for the kids will be the fact that while most of the other kids have a mummy and daddy, some of them will be out of luck in that department seeing as they have two daddies, or two mummies as the case may be. The progressive activist homo freaks have been spending a great deal of time and energy running around saying that this won’t affect children in the slightest, without any real corroborative evidence.

This is the exact same argument that was used by progressive activists to push through fault free divorce in 1975. Their argument then was that divorce would not affect children at all. They had no real evidence for this claim but they howled misogyny and harassment whenever anyone dared to challenge them. The end result was that no support system was put in place for children whose parents had divorced because the act of doing so would disqualify by default the activists’ core argument.

Finally in the late 80s when there was no danger of fault free divorce being challenged, systems were finally put in place to support children during such a stressful event. Of course it was too late for all of the children who had had to suck it up for the previous 15 years.

But this new decision is taking the welfare of vulnerable children to entirely new lows. It is no secret that homosexuals are much more inclined to prey on children in a sexual manner. It was one thing to allow open homosexuals into the priesthood where they could prey on children after choir practice. It’s another thing entirely to invite them under the same roof. But that is what this means. Because the other big development with the change to the marriage act will be the absolute future bonanza for divorce lawyers.

The average homosexual man has over a thousand sexual partners in his lifetime. It is very rare indeed for homosexual couples to stay together, let alone stay faithful to one another. I have no doubt that future homosexual divorce rates will be ludicrous. And all that this means will be a revolving door of new men through whatever unfortunate homosexual household a child is unlucky enough to grow up in. It won’t be a question of if, it will be a matter of when.

The left has made out that this vote was about the people who want the right to get married irrespective of their lifestyle. But marriage is and never has been about two people. It is about the children of that union and the care and nurture that they require. And it is about the ever expanding rings of relatives that surround that family unit. The aunts and uncles, the brothers and sisters in law, the grandparents and great grandparents, and the cousins. As a commenter on Catallaxy Files put it:

Relationships that span horizontally through communities and vertically through generations. Marriage isn’t about two individuals. It’s a complex cluster of relationships between a partnership and community. Legal marriage acknowledges this complexity, as demonstrated in contentious divorces where guardianship of children can devolve to relatives, and in contested probates.

Allowing state sanctioned sodomy into that complex system, a system that has sustained us as human beings for millennia, is a recipe for disaster. The only upside is for the short term feelings of homosexual couples. The potential downsides are much greater and far reaching. But the left only operate on emotion and feelings. Their entire reason for existing is change for the sake of change itself. Preservation is anathema to them. And as such they can only destroy.

As always, the real victims will be the children. But in the longer term it may well be our society itself.




Podcast #64 – The kindness episode.


Friday hawt chicks & links – The Ray Moore edition.


  1. Micko

    I predict that not far in the future there will be another stigma greater than ‘white privilege’. That being those of us privileged enough to have had a Mum & Dad throughout our entire upbringing and those ‘opposex’ parents are still married well into our adult life, ie. brought up in a loving heterosexual family.
    I am blessed to be one of these fortunate people and I’m making damn sure that my children will have the same benefit.
    However, I can see it being used against people in the future much like supposed ‘white privilege’ is used now.
    “Your opinion is biased because your Mum & Dad are still married….”, “How would you know anything, you have a Mum & a Dad…”
    Basically, if your upbringing is anything close to normal – your opinion will be invalid because progress.
    Ah, the left – making the abhorrent seem normal.

  2. Dave

    Very good article Adam. Your reading of it mirrors my own.

    We are on the fast track to Huxleys ‘Brave New World’ scenario of children being sexualised from a young age, raised by the state, and laughing at the very idea that once upon a time children were conceived and raised by a mother and father.

    I’m overseas too, so have been spared the hysterics of the yes voters and the celebrations of them and their enablers.

    The sad part is of course, these guys will still wake up from their nights on Oxford Street and hate themselves. No amount of propaganda, no matter how many laws are passed, not even a 100% yes return would satisfy them. They know they are messed up, and this exercise in delusion just makes their mental problems all the more worse.

    For the rest of us, I have to say, going home to celebrate Christmas will feel so shallow and hollow, looking around at my countrymen with utter contempt. They’ll take the holidays of course, but not for a second consider what the celebration of Christmas is actually about, nor the blasphemy they willingly endorsed and promoted.

  3. Brandon

    Whilst we have transgenderism sweeping through UK schools with no popular mandate the next perversity will be adult consenting incest, so called Genetic attraction syndrome, (don’t you love the pseudo label’s), and lowering the age of consent (the French are debating 13). First cousin marriage will appear moderate by comparison.

    Another really dangerous one will be polygamy to accommodate “our” Islamic communities. This will be sold to us as an answer to the shortage of available husband material men but instead will lead to more promiscuity, easy divorce and increased levels of single parenthood, illegitimacy and welfare dependence. It will be the non-Islamic communities that will be devastated.

    Polygamy was one of the driving forces of Islamic expansion and warfare…Islamic men needed more women from other tribes and nations. So it will restructure urban cities and force sharp competition between men for the limited quality or otherwise females available. Not exactly a time to be a soft beta male. Throw in the Sex Robots, gene-editing and mass migration and the smirking Anti-Christ will be able to put his feet up.

  4. RS

    Once you realize that the entire purpose of the Progressive/Left project is to destroy the Nuclear Family which is the only thing which stands in competition to the State for an individual’s loyalties, all becomes clear. Whether it’s various social “safety” nets designed to subsidize irresponsibility, old age pensions/social security designed to outsource taking care of one’s elderly family members to the state, no-fault divorce designed to encourage easy destruction of family units, economic policies which encourage two-earner households, thereby necessitating universal day-care, sanction of alternative “marriage” arrangements to dilute the special nature of the life-time heterosexual pair bond, the end goal is the same: weaken and ultimately dissolve all elements of the natural affection which exist among family members. Nothing can be allowed to compete with the state for the loyalties of its subjects.

  5. One of the most interesting results of this survey was where the highest ‘No’ vote came from. Western Sydney. You know: Paramatta, Lakemba. That place. I wonder if there’s something statistically unusual about the population there.

    • Adam

      No idea. They don’t avoid consuming bacon by any chance do they?

  6. “It is no secret that homosexuals are much more inclined to prey on children in a sexual manner.”

    Think I’ve posted this before on this site, but it bears repeating.

    This is from a militant homosexual group in San Francisco:
    “We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us. … We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.” -The Gay Manifesto
    Growing up just to the East of Hollywood I was the victim of four faggot attacks by the time I was 14. Fortunately, I was able to either run away or, in one case had to bail out of a moving car (that’s when hitchhiking was still an acceptable way to get around).

    At age 15 I had three friends who were fed booze and drugs by a YMCA councilor and then either ass-raped or forced to suck the perv’s dick. I didn’t find out about it until his was convicted of sex crimes and sent to the pen when I was a freshman in college.  Hope died a million deaths in prison at the hands of rough men who dispose pedos worse than anybody else in the slammer.

    I can’t tell you how many times fags made passes at me, exposed themselves, or outright grabbed my crotch or ass while I was delivering pizza in Hollywood.

    Ann Barnheardt, with whom I generally disagree, has their sick minds nailed when she labels them “Diabolical Narcissists”. Sex and power is all they care about. Read that passage I quoted above and let it sing in deeply. Pass it around so others may know of their deeply fucked-up evil minds.

  7. Nothing says “advanced civilization” like men buggering each other.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

%d bloggers like this: