Comment of the week comes from last week’s comment of the week thread. How about that. It’s from someone named Ben David. The comment was agreeing with me about the deviant nature of homosexuality and how it was pushed by activists and liberal media. But I have a few issues with what he had to say.

But ALL this came AFTER the HETEROsexual majority threw over Judeo-Christian sexual morality and agreed to view themselves as hairless chimpanzees. The hetero public accepted the “born that way” myth and the self-declared victimhood/entitlement because they had already accepted pseudo-scientific excuses to embrace their own “natural” sexual desires, and legitimate progress on civil rights issues had been subverted into a discourse about victimhood and entitlement.

Hmmm … what is this Judeo-Christian construct of which he speaks?

(Similarly, the alt-right perpetuates the Leftie frame of racial discourse, instead of re-asserting the Judeo-Christian humanism on which free democracies are based.)

Oh, it’s a “humanism”. And all our democracies are based upon it. How curious.

This is a complete falsehood. As Vox Day states, the term “Judeo-Christian” makes about as much sense as “Islamo-Christianity”:

Anyone who is using the term “Judeo-Christian” is referencing, consciously or not, left-wing anti-Christian agitprop. There are no historical “Judeo-Christian” values; to the extent there is overlap they are Christian values.

Note that “Judeo-Christian” in its post-1940s revisionist usage is a part of the same program as the 1965 Hart-Celler Act. It was adopted specifically to redefine America and destroy the historical fact of America having been founded as a de facto Christian nation.

Ben David rails against liberal agitators while falling for one of their most devious bits of propaganda, (although with a name like that perhaps I am being far too generous).

The false construct of “Judeo-Christian” really took off after WWII for reasons which should be clear to anyone with an iota of historical knowledge. As Day states, it is a complete 20th century fraud. The following graph of mentions from books in the 20th century of the terms “Judeo-Christian civilization”, “Christian civilization”, and “Muslim civilization” is very illuminating.

Enough with this lie of so-called “Judeo-Christian” values. It is Christian values and that is all it has ever been. Do not fall for the biggest liberal prog deception of all time.

I haven’t finished with Ben’s comment though. He also had this to say:

From this perspective I take a rather dim view of Game as an instrument of cultural redemption. It may save innocent young men from financial and emotional ruin, but the alternate language it offers perpetuates the Leftie value framework in which humans are defined by their baser instincts.

Firstly, great powers can be used for good and evil. Game is an absolute necessity for men to be able to navigate the treacherous waters of female relationships. The fact that it can also be used by cads does not negate its value.

And lastly, humans are defined by their baser instincts. The alt-right deals in reality, not pretty lies or devious falsehoods. And the great bulwark that our Western civilization has historically used to counter man’s baser instincts has been the core Western pillar of Christianity. Not “Judeo-Christianity” mind you. Christianity. At this time of the year in particular it would behoove us to remember that.