Adam Piggott

Gentleman adventurer

Ladies, your college degree and job won’t get you laid.

A recent discussion I had with a 40 year old Australian woman was interesting for me. The topic was what attracts men to women. My argument was the standard manosphere line: men are attracted to youth, beauty, and femininity; women compete with other women for men; if you’re a woman competing for a man your main rivals are those women who hold those attributes.

Which means for a 40 year old divorced gal with two kids, she’s not really in the frame for the quality men out there who possess the attributes that women place at the top of their list: wealth, status, power, and great hair.

This of course did not go down well at all.

What really struck me was her complete denial of the facts and logic that I spelled out for her. She accused me of making things up. She demanded that I show her evidence and studies, as if I walk around with my hip pocket stuffed full of documented notations for whatever arguments I might run into that day.

I told her that the evidence was in plain sight and that all she had to do was open her eyes and see it. How about the unending multitude of articles to be found on a daily basis somewhere in the world on the general theme of ‘where have all the good men gone?’ and ‘why don’t men want to marry anymore?’, all of them written by 30 or 40 something women. If men want what you’re selling, why aren’t they lining up? Not only are they not lining up, they’re nowhere in sight.

Or the fact that women who possess the traits that women themselves find attractive have a very hard time landing a man. I dare one of you supremely educated and wildly successful in your chosen career girls in your 30s or 40s to walk into a sports bar and wave around your college degree and your last pay slip and see if one of those quality men comes a-runnin’.

And even if one did, (which wouldn’t happen), all we’d have to do next is to send in some perky 20 year old lass dressed in something that would get her hired at Hooters and your recent conquest would be gone faster than an alt-right speaker flying in to Gatwick airport.

When the facts and logic started wearing her down she reverted to condescension. Started acting amused, as if she was some school marm observing one of her young charges attempting to mix it with the adults. Just about the only behavioral aspect that she didn’t display was patting me on the head.

I told her to quit with the martyred mother act as I wasn’t in the market for her approval. Which went as well as you’d expect.

The conversation was interesting for me solely because I have been insulated from women like her for some time, and thus I had underestimated or perhaps forgotten how strong their capacity for self-delusion really is. It’s hard enough to admit that you’ve been playing a losing hand for a long time. But to admit that you’ve played that losing hand and also acknowledge that you have no hope to turn things around? Well, that’s just about impossible. All you’ll get out of that is a gigantic case of the bitterness brigade.

For women who swallowed the lie that they could have it all and that men would be attracted to money and careers, the acceptance of the truth that men are attracted to big tits and tight bottoms is devastating. But I have no sympathy for them as these same women most likely attempted to use their fading female charms to help them rise up their chosen career path. If you’re that obtuse then there’s just no hope for you.

Ladies, I can’t spell out for you clearly enough – us men don’t care at all for your power careers, (read jobs), your bank balance, the car you drive, or what you shot at golf this week. That’s what we do. You’re the female equivalent of soy boys – men trying to be girls, except you’re women trying to be men. We already have our buddies and they serve a need that you can’t fill. Just like you serve a need that we sincerely hope our buddies never want to fill, if you know what I mean and I think that you do.

And if you blew your window of female opportunity on solipsistic desires of wanting to have it all? I hear that Christianity is making a comeback. Maybe the convents are open again. All you girls in there together, serving God. You gotta love the patriarchy.




Podcast #2 – The red bow ties for gun control episode.


Friday hawt chicks & links – The trad thots get deported edition.


  1. earl

    Seems to be the trend…I listened to this Stefan video where it runs about a hour long where he talks with this 32 year old Swedish woman had no clue what men are looking for either. She just thought they wanted what she wants.

  2. Adam

    “gone faster than an alt-right speaker flying in to Gatwick airport.” Ha ha, nice one.
    Women are fed the lie that they can be mothers and have careers. The problem is you can’t do both well. And choosing to pursue a career first may use up all a woman’s fertility window and – no eggs (read, tits & arse), no man.
    Women need to man up to the truth. I say ‘man up’ because it is usually only men who can do this. Women are used to a ‘silver platter’ life because they are used to society, and men in particular, serving them. But get past 35 or 40 and look out ladies. Your tits & arse days are over. Reality sucks but the truth really will set you free (and hopefully make you a nicer person).
    Earl, I heard that call-in to Stefan Molyneux’s show too. The Swedish doctor who can’t find a man – totally clueless. Your eggs are getting old, it really doesn’t matter how much money you earn. There is no affirmative action for biology ladies. Get out there early and get a good man. Careers are overrated.

  3. When it came to financials I was always very interested in how a women handled money, not how much they might have. Is she thrifty and a saver? Nope, see ya. If she treats her own money poorly what do you think she’ll do with yours?

  4. Phil B

    One (among many) of the big disincentives is the disproportionate risk that marriage entails for a man and the financial penalties when the woman wants to split. Three words sum it up:

    Heather Mills McCartney.

    The cost is as follows:

    Date of Marriage Tue, 11 Jun 02 £24,300,000.00
    Date of Separation Wed, 17 May 06 1436 £16,922.01 £705.08
    Date of Divorce Mon, 12 May 08 2162 £11,239.59 £468.32

    The columns are as follows:
    *Event (marriage, etc.)
    *No. of days between marriage and separation/divorce
    *Settlement figure (24.3 Million pounds) and the value per day
    *Payment PER HOUR.

    I’d ask what she did to deserve that and bear in mind that Paul McCartney had to pay, in addition, £35,000 a year for a nanny and child costs … He should have hired a butler, a cook and prostitutes. It would have worked out a lot cheaper.

    Look for divorce settlements reported in the newspapers and the ridiculous amounts paid out for a woman doing not much more than lying on her back and opening her crack and you’ll realise that the risk isn’t worth it.

    Add in that women are so promiscuous nowadays that there is no premium to marrying when you can get it for free (and who wants to be no. 1,378 or thereabouts?).

    A woman of that age wants a meal ticket and sperm donor so she can have bay-beees and once she has, then its divorce and a free house, child support and maintenance from the sucker for the next 20 or so years. Zesty, eh?

    If the man has cash, a good job and income then he will have the pick of the crop. Who wants stale bread when you can have fresh for the same money and/or commitment. Just don’t marry them ever.

    Plus being told by a desperate woman to “man up and do what I want, you loser” is hardly a sales strategy to appeal to anyone that has enough sense to come in out of the rain.

    No, ladies. You have got what you wanted. I’m buying shares in cat food, cat litter and cat toy manufacturers. It has a better long term future and dividend than marriage.

    • John

      Why are the divorce figures never discussed when the Gender Pay Gap gets discussed? Talk about the Elephant in the room.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

%d bloggers like this: