Friday hawt chicks & links – The King’s Day edition.

Welcome to the weekly hawt chicks & links thread, the most keenly anticipated weekly publication in all of the entire worldsz. What makes the hawt hicks & links thread so great? Is it the links? Is it the hawt chicks? Or is it my sharp wit, honed on the bare souls of countless leftist fucks over many millennia. May Crom be my guide.

Today is King’s Day in Holland. The streets are festooned with the Dutch flag, people are walking around dressed in orange and drinking beer, and there are hordes of young Dutch blonde hotties with smiles and open arms. What’s not to like?

Does the left really hate guns or do they just hate white gun owners?

If you are a gun-wielding jihadist, leftists will find every excuse to turn a blind eye to your evil and direct their outrage toward white, law-abiding defenders of the Second Amendment. If you are a gun-wielding, non-white illegal alien like the multiple-felony murderer of San Francisco’s Kate Steinle, the left will shield you in a sanctuary city and blame Steinle for being white, pretty, and causing trouble for you by getting in the way of your bullet. If you are part of a gun-wielding black mob torturing and massacring white farm-owning families in South Africa, the left will wag its finger at the families themselves and blame your savagery on their colonialist oppression. The left hates you.

What about white leftists? Do white leftists hate themselves? Yes, although they do love themselves during their ecstatic spasms of virtue-signaling. Hence their self-flagellating claims of their own purported white privilege, cultural appropriation, and colonialist past. But mostly they hate you, law-abiding white patriots – make no mistake about it.

It’s beyond time to begin hating them right back, and in meaningful and palpable ways. Time I composed another vicious screed. That’ll show ’em.

***

The Hippocratic oath is to first do no harm. It seems that the smelly poms have forgotten this.

A children’s hospital in Rome has offered a free flight and free care at their clinic. The flight would be staffed by their own employees.

Cost to the UK? Zero point zero pounds.

But for some reason, judges have proclaimed that not only is the state justified in denying care, but the state is further justified in taking active steps towards killing the infant, despite the parent’s wishes and despite an offer of free care by a less savage nation.

Never forget that under the welfare state your children belong to the government, not you. but people in the UK have begun speaking out at this foul and perverted government overreach. The reaction from their betters?

The cops won’t do anything about the hordes of third world savages terrorizing the nation, but they’re making a big effort to monitor what the few remaining natives are saying.

***

Depending on your point of view it either hasn’t been a good week for the British plod or the British public. Man fined and jailed for giving speed cameras the finger.

Perhaps, but Timothy Hill isn’t the only one looking smug here. The public are getting increasingly fed up with Plod harrassing drivers and using speed traps as revenue generators, passing them off as safety measures. Condescending remarks like “it’s also an excellent way to end up in prison” only serve to illustrate the yawning chasm between the police and the public.

***

Staying with Tim Newman, he has published a novel called Window on a Burning Man, (which is on my to read list), in which women are somehow held accountable for their past actions. How shocking and unseemly. Some of Tim’s readers, all women, have taken umbrage to this.

A reasonably common reaction to my book which has come mainly from women in their early thirties is:

“None of Katya’s past should matter; it’s in the past!”

At least two women have said they believe the past has no bearing on the present, and a line should be drawn whereby a person’s entire history is consigned to a vault and not considered in the relationship going forward. In this post I’m going to unpack that idea.

I left the following comment:

“The very last thing that women want is to be held accountable and responsible for their actions. The entire feminist model is predicated on this.”

But I can go further – isn’t it interesting that the comment mainly comes from women in their thirties. These are women who are in the process of hitting the wall, and, more importantly, running out of viable options. That their past could be dredged up and waved in front of them is the stuff of female nightmares.

But also, is this attitude of what happened in the past should stay in the past universally and fairly applied?

Former NBC news anchor Tom Brokaw accused of sexual harassment.

In the case of Vester’s accusations against Brokaw, we are talking about alleged incidents that happened more than 20 years ago. Vester left NBC News in 1999. Tom Brokaw is now 78 years old and has been married to the same woman since 1962. While no one can condone the behavior that Vester alleges, what is accomplished by dragging Brokaw’s name through the mud now? After NBC’s Matt Lauer was destroyed by sexual harassment allegations, I remarked that “the reason this is happening is because Hillary lost and Trump won”

The entire #metoo movement is based upon holding men accountable for actions so far in the past that nobody will be able to prove either way that they were dreamed up by women for personal gain, petty revenge and power plays.

***

Dalrock discovers a man who has listed out the rules for dating his precious little daughter.

How long should you date a Daughter of the King?  Until she’s done with you!

Rule Six:

I have no doubt you are a popular fellow, with many opportunities to date other girls. This is fine with me as long as it is okay with my daughter. Otherwise, once you have gone out with my little girl, you will continue to date no one but her until she is finished with you. If you make her cry, I will make you cry.

Click through to the original post and read all of his hilarious rules! Fun for the whole family! He does a great deal of posturing, posing, threatening, and the like. But this was the bit that I liked the best:

Do not lie to me. I may appear to be a potbellied, balding, middle-aged, dimwitted has-been.

That really puts all of his threats to kill into context, does it not?

***

Some groovy jazz tunes I discovered.

***

8 thoughts on “Friday hawt chicks & links – The King’s Day edition.

  1. earl

    “The very last thing that women want is to be held accountable and responsible for their actions. The entire feminist model is predicated on this.”

    And it has spread everywhere…hence the new name Churchianity. Men are responsible for all the sin in the world and women are just pure beacons not responsible for any of the things they’ve done.

    Like

  2. But also, is this attitude of what happened in the past should stay in the past universally and fairly applied?

    That’s a good point: the whole “it’s in the past” approach is a little inconsistent with MeToo, isn’t it?

    Like

  3. Pingback: In The Mailbox: 04.27.18 : The Other McCain

  4. Pingback: FMJRA 2.0: Exactly What You Wanted : The Other McCain

  5. I show up for the hawt chick, I stay for the insightful commentary. They I go look at the hawt chick again. Sorry, you only get one look. 🙂

    My ex-wife used to pull the “in the past” shit all the time. When I expressed a mistrust based on her misusing our funds (due to alcohol and drug issues) in the past, she would accuse me of never letting anything go. Then she would lie to me again, and around the carousel went.

    Good article on the hatred for white people. It really is true. No matter where you look, white people are responsible for everything bad that happens, even if it is due to the personal choices of the other. Never mind that the British Empire used to consist of well run and prosperous countries with an educated populace, they are outhouse hellholes now because of colonialism. Never mind that Muslims are killing people left and right in the most gruesome ways, it is due to our interference in the Middle East.

    OK, back to check out the hawt chick again. Later.

    Like

  6. Moritz Kraemer

    The guy who got put away for flipping off the camera actually went in for having a laser jammer fitted, which is clearly visible in the picture. When you’re breaking the law, I do advise a low profile. Much as I dislike the abuse of British law enforcement, who appear more concerned with preventing medical care than preventing terrorism, we shouldn’t attack them on this one.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.