The science that cried wolf.

An article today in The Australian concerning the imminent demise of the Great Barrier Reef and the exhortation that something must be done is interesting not for its bloated and deceitful content but for the comments that follow it. The writer, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, is the director of something called The Global Change Institute at the university of Queensland.

The Global Change Institute (GCI) at The University of Queensland is an independent source of innovative research, ideas, policy and advice for addressing the challenges of a changing world.

In other words, do-gooders who managed to wrangle themselves sweet funding under the guise of ‘the end of the world is nigh!’ (Notice how you don’t see those crazy guys holding placards outside dusty train stations anymore? They’re all employed in the climate scam industry.)

The crux of the scaremongering in the article comes down to this bit:

The changes are being driven by the climate, which is the reef’s most significant threat. The Great Barrier Reef Outlook Report, produced by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, makes that clear, as does the Reef 2050 Plan, the overarching framework for protecting and managing it developed by the commonwealth and Queensland governments. It tells us that a lack of action on climate change will see our reef disappear, along with other vital ecosystems.

Get that? The reef will disappear! (Waves arms and runs around in circles whilst making the boogy-man noise).

The comments that follow the article are uniform in their scorn and ridicule for the false message that the climate doomsters have been predicting for so long now. What a turnaround from just a few years ago when the majority of comments would have elicited tones of deep concern and shock that such a great tragedy was about to befall our nation and our world.

That’s what an increase of over 500% on domestic energy prices will do to your message of doom.

Scientists have sure been banging on for quite some time now about a variety of doomsday disasters caused by us human folk that somehow have all failed to materialize as predicted. We were going to run out of oil, copper, gold, gas and just about every other resource you could poke a stick at by the 1980s. The world was going to be consumed by horrible famines caused by overpopulation, while instead we’re now producing so much food that we’re using the leftovers to fuel vehicles. There was going to be a new ice age, then it was global warming, and finally they hit upon the singular brilliant tautology of climate change.

That last one is indeed true because the climate is not static. Way to go scientists; you got one right! (Not.)

There has been so much scientific bullshit that people are becoming somewhat inured to what so-called scientists claim. James Delingpole just doesn’t trust scientists anymore:

It’s not science they distrust so much as scientists — especially ones in more nebulous, activism-driven fields like ecology or sociology. As Cofnas told Campus Reform, a site that exposes left-wing bias at universities: ‘Conservatives are right to be sceptical. Take any politicised issue that is connected to some disagreement about scientific fact. I do not believe there is a single case in the last couple of decades where a major scientific organisation took a position that went against the platform of the Democratic party.’ He added: ‘What an odd coincidence that “science” always, without exception, supports the liberal worldview.’

The politicization of science, the substitution of scientody for scientistry, is in of itself inherently unscientific as it relies on some sort of left-leaning democratic process. To get ahead in this rigged game, people pretending to be scientists have to make things up. How else can one explain the appalling revelation that less than 50% of scientific studies can be replicated.

Six such projects, including the SSRP, have now been completed. Between them, they’ve successfully replicated just 87 out of 190 studies, for an overall rate of 46 percent.

No doubt many of these bogus studies were cited in peer-reviewed journals and used to badger dim and corrupt politicians into squandering the resources and wealth of their countries into placating the great climate god Ghia.

But the people aren’t believing it anymore. I’ve been bashing heads with climate change idiots online and in real life for over 10 years, but the turnaround in attitude that we’re now seeing really does underline the fact that the general public isn’t buying it anymore.

Which is too bad for science. You can only cry wolf so many times before the public no longer believes you. And if then a real calamity should present itself, a calamity that only science could identify, predict or solve; what then?

Science. Just one more part of our civilization that the prog army of darkness has successfully destroyed.

13 thoughts on “The science that cried wolf.

  1. Dan F

    ‘And if then a real calamity should present itself, a calamity that only science could identify, predict or solve; what then?’

    What a strange point you’re making Adam. You’re at once acknowledging the importance of science while saying we shouldn’t listen to scientists anymore. I wonder if articles like this will still be floating around the internet in decades to come, they’ll be excellent case studies in cognitive dissonance.

    Like

    1. Robert Wood

      True… back then it was the Crown of Thorns Starfish that was going to be the end of the GBR. Since then it’s been agricultural run-off from farming, water that’s been too warm, water that’s been too cold, too much fresh water from flooding river outflow, not enough fresh water… the list goes on. All these have come and gone, and the reef is still here (and thriving, if you ask the actual people that frequent the reef on a regular basis). People don’t seem to understand HOW BIG in size the GBR actually is!

      Like

  2. Pingback: In The Mailbox: 08.29.18 : The Other McCain

  3. Dave

    I used to take American university students to the great barrier reef for a few years about a decade or so ago. They were all ‘grateful’ for the chance to see if before it ‘disappeared’…

    My laughter would stun them into silence. I made bets with all of the true believers for 10k that within a decade the reef would still be there (a decade being double the time frame that they were certain it would cease to exist – or so their professors and tv told them).

    I’m yet to collect the 10k!

    Like

  4. I think it was the hole in the ozone layer that was the trial run for catastrophic anthropomorphic global warming. Aren’t we also due to be keeling over with mass Bovine Spongiform encephalopathy or Aids or the clap or something?

    And for the fifth year in a row a group of climatologists’ boat got frozen in the Artic visiting an area with record levels of Ice during the melt season. What every will come next?

    Oh yes it’s the spread of hordes of mega plastic packaging over the face of the earth.

    Which points to what all this nonsense is really about: Firstly, disrupt society’s norms getting people to comply with any kind of double think and cognitive dissonance. Promote the underlying message “we need a world government to save us from ourselves.” Escalate the claims to absurd levels until some sane people say, for example, women don’t have penises and men don’t have periods; and pick off these people leaving only the passive Eloi.

    Speaking of hoaxes Q Anon has been fully exposed as a scam, something I have thought for months, see @UNIRockTV amongst other sources.

    Sadly the great military coup and executions of Hillary and co at Guantanamo were all hot (global warming) air. Sad. Sad.

    Like

  5. Pingback: News of the Week (September 3rd, 2018) | The Political Hat

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.