Good whites versus bad whites.

Whenever I write an article on race I’ll always get someone who will respond with a comment like this one:

What if the migrant is more K selective, more embracing of free market and free speech, and more conscientious than locals?

That comment was left on Facebook by someone with the surname of Li. It seems that some of the interlopers, or at least those who possess half a brain and a modicum of situational awareness, are looking around at Australia’s out of control diversity with a growing sense of unease. As well they should. Implicit in this objection is the argument that the invader is of a better quality than the original inhabitant, thereby rendering the takeover and subversion of the original nation and its people acceptable due to the superiority of the incoming replacements.

It is of course an entirely racist viewpoint, but the prevailing wisdom of the last 50 years has been the lie that only white people are capable of being racist. The left have based their entire existence on this deceit, and as The Z Man points out it was the great sin of conservatives to abandon the acceptance of the human condition for one that attempted to do away with the hierarchical and tribal reality of humans.

The fact that Asians are in general the most racist people on the planet is a fact not lost on anyone with a functioning frontal cortex. But people, white people at least, don’t like to consider this reality because of the fact that it makes them so uncomfortable. Whites are so conditioned by the prog left lies of race that even the idea of thinking of an observation along these lines is enough to send most good whites into paroxysms of despair at their obvious inherent racism.

But as any Asian can tell you, racism is a good thing. Racism has allowed Japan to stay entirely Japanese. Racism has done the same for China, as well as every other country in the region. The Indian government is in the process of expelling 4 million people of Bangladeshi origin, many of whom originally came to India in 1971 as well as a great many born in India. It matters not to the Indians as they have proven to be incompatible with the host nation and thus their time is up.

Do you think that there might be some conscientious K selective free market and free speech embracers in that enormous number of people? Most probably, but out the door they are in the process of going. The Indian government understands that for India to survive and prosper in the region then it has to remain inherently Indian.

Our own succession of Australian governments over the past 50 years have completely discarded this reality and instead set about on a course to replace the native white population of British origin with a worldwide hodgepodge of whomever they could get and whomever would cough up the university money to get in the back door. That Australia is held up in Europe as some sort of bastion of the defense of borders is quite possibly the most ridiculous and laughable idea since New Coke. Sure we stopped a couple of thousand from coming in the naughty way, but at the same time we have been importing a quarter of a million a year, the vast majority from India and China, and some think that the real figure is up to three times that amount on an annual basis.

It’s not unusual for the viewpoint in the quoted comment to be expressed by a native Australian. In fact, I would say that the vast majority of the time this is the case. The idea is that if the new arrivals are harder working than the “bad whites” then they should be let in and human instinct should be allowed to take its course. By human instinct what the native Australian hopes for is for the lower class white trash of Australia to disappear, replaced by their hardworking Asian betters. Implicit in this is the fact that the new arrivals will still be on a social level several rungs lower than the original acceptable whites.

Tensions in Australia between the different classes are historical and go back to convict times. Australia required hard men to conquer its terrible landscape, but the inconvenience for the city dwellers was that those hard men tend to sire children. In its most basic form this was a clash between the English and the Irish, with the Scots placed somewhere uncomfortably in the middle. The hope was that a need for hard men would die out, but two world wars and a mining boom and bust cycle that has lasted over a hundred years put paid to that hope.

Which is why Australian conservatives were so quick to jump on the theory of the bad racist whites. The lower class yobbos that the upper classes had to put up with could be replaced by the new arrivals. The fact that the new arrivals tended to compete directly for the lower class jobs and businesses was all part of the grand design. This attitude is reflected in the USA with the disdain that the chattering classes holds for those living in what is termed ‘flyover country’. Hillary Clinton labelled them as deplorables, which was only a step too far because of what it finally awakened. Those attitudes have not disappeared; if anything they have only grown stronger. Politico’s Marc Caputo recently mocked attendees of a Trump rally as ‘toothless garbage people.’

Class war has been a feature of Australia and the USA since their foundations, a fact that is only now becoming readily apparent since for most of their history these two nations have held themselves aloof and apart from Great Britain in this respect.

What the upper classes didn’t count on was the ferocious nationalism and tribalism that is implicit in many of these imported populations. New arrivals to Australia in the 1950s and 60s made a conscious effort to integrate as well as they could because they had no choice in the matter since they were vastly outnumbered by the native population. But today with that no longer the case every granddaughter of an immigrant is proudly declaring her allegiance to whatever nation her people originally came from.

In other words, the idea was to replace the bad whites with compliant servant races which would do the jobs that the bad whites previously did and that the good whites think are beneath them. What wasn’t anticipated is that the invitational populations would eventually band together in their respective tribal groups and begin the process of attempting to take over. This had not been considered because of the concurrent belief in the lie that people other than whites not only cannot be racist but they will not align themselves along tribal lines.

The lie regarding racism was adopted as an attempt to convince themselves that there would be no consequences for the mass importation of foreigners for them; for the good whites.

This steaming pot of races and inter-tribal factions has been unwittingly set up over the past 50 years for an eventual implosion along racial and tribal lines that could well make the Rwanda massacres look like an African picnic. The Li’s of the world are the unfortunate ones who will be caught in the middle. No amount of K selection superiority is going to help you when the good whites and the bad whites get down to finishing a long and dirty business.

15 thoughts on “Good whites versus bad whites.

  1. Nebia Hill

    Key point: ” New arrivals to Australia in the 1950s and 60s made a conscious effort to integrate as well as they could because they had no choice in the matter since they were vastly outnumbered by the native population.”

    Say no more…….

    Like

  2. TechieDude

    I have a hard time wrapping my head around the thought that here in the USA my black, mexican, and asian buddies, in every way like me except for skin color and looks, are somehow going to go tribal when times get tough. I can see that with immigration and entitlements though.

    Not that it won’t happen here. But before that time comes, things are going to have to get so bad that it’ll be every man for himself. What’ll ignite this misery is an economic implosion. There’ll be a point where it’ll be apparent there’s no money for social programs of any kind. The priority will be (here, by law) social security. So there’ll be millions left standing when the music stops. Chances are better than average that solutions will happen long before there’s blood in the streets. 50-50 it gets worked out, because if it doesn’t I don’t think it matters what color your are, it’ll be a fuck-all.

    By guns and ammo while you still can.

    BTW – The elites attitude about “flyover” and deplorables wasn’t directed at white trash. It was directed at the vast swath of christian middle and upper middle classes that hold socially and fiscally conservative values. Lower class whites are invisible to that crowd.

    Like

  3. Screwtape

    Goodwhites also cling to the magical thinking (feeling) that: (a) deep down, all peoples are as they are; and related, (b) their own lack of in group preference means that no other groups exhibit in group/out group behaviors.

    The projection en masse of the white prog religion of “tolerance” (submission of their in group preference) and “diversity” (sacrificial offering of their race and culture) coupled with the massive self-imposed blind spot of group preference and civilized subordination is a recipe for genocide.

    Their beliefs don’t survive any kind of test in real life. But conveniently all failures are packaged as rationale for moar supplication.

    And when exported, and carried their Patagonia backpacks of white privilege to the wild and dusky continents, this toxic belief system often ends with their head on a spike.

    But even then we see the power of the prog religion and depths of the brainwashing as the heads-on-spikes becomes merely tragic wrong place wrong time that can be avoided if only “we” (whites) do more to understand the plight of the others and to further sacrefice our whiteness to Progress.

    Like

  4. didact117

    Do you think that there might be some conscientious K selective free market and free speech embracers in that enormous number of people? Most probably, but out the door they are in the process of going.

    There are, in fact, a few of us God-fearing, K-selected, free market-loving, free speech-embracing, “little brown brothers” in India. Some of us even enjoy lifting weights, punching people in the face, dating beautiful women, drinking good wine, driving fast cars, and vigourously defending PROPER usage of Her Majesty the Queen’s Ye Olde English.

    But we are roughly one in about fifty million.

    That is the serious category error made by white Westerners, repeatedly, with respect to their little brown brothers. Westerners think that just because a few thousand Dirt Worlders have come over to their countries and done well, kept their noses clean, and generally acted like solid upstanding citizens, the REST of the Dirt World must surely be the same.

    This is idiotic on its face.

    Outside of the Far East, you will not find a more racist country than India. You will find dysfunction, chaos, noise, crowding, utter lack of personal hygiene, and complete cluelessness about women and game.

    That is not the kind of country that you white folks should want the West to become. India has many virtues, to be sure – but it is not compatible with the West. The Brits tried hard to civilise it, but they screwed up royally at many points along the way, and now India is what it is because of Indians.

    It is a never-ending source of fascination to me as to why whites hate themselves so much. This is the same race that brought light and electricity and decent plumbing to the rest of the world, yet now seems Hell-bent on making up for past sins by letting the entire Dirt World take advantage of them.

    My dear white friends, do not forget who you are or what you have created. Do not forget that your nations are great because YOU are great. And stop importing the rest of the Dirt World to expiate your great-great-great-grandfather’s supposed sins.

    Some of us left the Dirt World to live in quiet, orderly, peaceful, decent, clean societies because we like and respect white folks, and are willing to uphold and support their laws and way of life. We didn’t go to your countries to bring that kind of dysfunction back over with us.

    Like

  5. Allen

    It doesn’t matter. It’s purely a numbers game. If you have unfettered immigration you will get an unsupportable population growth. It’s certainly becoming true in the US. With that comes an increase in conflict over resources, and since humans tend to segregate along racial and ethnic lines the inevitable follows.

    Lest anyone thinks ethnic strife will spare some forget about it. Look at that white dude who lost in a primary to the Hispanic woman in New York. He probably thought since he was the giver of the resources he would be spared. Surprise! Just remember, go ahead and give others the power, they’ll be sure to remember you fondly and reward you appropriately.

    They know what their self-interest is, do you know what yours is?

    Like

  6. TechieDude:
    “I have a hard time wrapping my head around the thought that here in the USA my black, mexican, and asian buddies, in every way like me except for skin color and looks, are somehow going to go tribal when times get tough. I can see that with immigration and entitlements though.”

    It’s okay to like nonwhites individually while opposing nonwhites generally. It sounds like hypocrisy but is really a question of scale. A lot of immigration’s damage is letting in high-performing nonwhites without the realization that their kids are going to “regress towards the mean” as a mathematician would put it.

    You might like many women but that doesn’t mean you would marry them.

    Things will absolutely go tribal. Ethnicity is the crudest, lowest but least refutable form of group identity. Every other identity is being ruined by the Elites: nation, religion, the family, not language yet but I’m shocked the UN isn’t pushing Esperanto again. (Maybe they don’t see the need with computer translators.) Humans are social and will always seek a group identity.

    Particularly when they lack a father figure.

    Like

  7. Dave

    I think its important to understand what happened to our ‘good white’ ruling class.

    In the summer of 1914, the manor house society types were the guardians of our order. Everyone knew their place, and good men defended this order in uniform in every part of the empire, while the great universities produced truly brilliant men like Enoch Powell. Masters of long since gone languages, deep defenders of our culture and heritage. The notion that any of these men would entertain the concept of racial guilt was laughable. They were the best and they knew it. Kipling’s works reminded them of this and their duty to bring civilisation to those incapable of it.

    Four years later, those manor houses were empty of their treasures, and many of the inhabitants dead. Many of the good whites died (first over the top), what was left was the lesser good whites or younger siblings.

    It was these lesser good whites that became the new aristocracy and they proved woefully inadequate to the task. Full of doubt and easily manipulated by socialism.

    I believe Tolkein nailed this in the Lord of the Rings, when comparing the old Kings of Gondor in comparison to the lesser men who became Stewards of Gondor.

    What we need is a return of the King. Men with the birthright, who are determined to restore the glory of our past. Not the current puppet/wormtounges like David Cameron, May, Obama, Clinton. Turnbull etc. Or for that matter, Harry, one who had such promise, but after his marriage announcement I lost complete respect for. That woman wouldn’t have been eligible to serve as part of the staff in the manor house days….

    Like

      1. Dave

        Sweden ceased being an influence in Europe long before WW1. I would suggest they suffered the equivalent of the WW1 catastrophies in the 18th century. They lost a series of wars as their empire vanished and Kingdom shrank correspondingly with their confidence.

        Im no Swedish expert, but considering that their last war was in the Napoleonic era (which saw humiliating territorial losses), I think the martial spirit in them was pretty much shot for good.

        For me, that’s a pretty clear correlation for their behaviour since (Nobel peace prizes, neutrality at all costs, can’t we all just get along etc etc).

        Like

  8. There will come a time in the not-too-distant future where your skin color will be your uniform.

    As the commenter above said: Buy guns and ammo while you still can. Especially ammo.

    Like

  9. Uncle Tim

    TechieDude:

    “I have a hard time wrapping my head around the thought that here in the USA my black, mexican, and asian buddies, in every way like me except for skin color and looks, are somehow going to go tribal when times get tough. I can see that with immigration and entitlements though.”

    Oh really, these non white buddies are exactly like you in every way?

    Have you ever had an actual confrontation with them over anything?

    You are not going to like what you find out when it happens. Everything you said about them being exactly like you will be contradicted when it comes out of their mouths. The first words out of their mouth will be that you are a white racist. I have already seen this multiple times.

    It happened to my father last week. His so-called black friend of 25 years labeled him a white racist because he likes Trump. Than my father got to listen to a tirade about Trump.

    White have white guilt because of Cultural Marxism and the Frankfurt School. Than you will come to understand what is happening.

    What we are all experiencing is the end state of a multi decade campaign to destroy the European people. Its been going on since before WW2 and greatly accelerated after WW2. By the 50s and 60s the left had total control of academia in colleges/universities.

    The difference between than and now is back than they had to be more careful about saying things outright because of a backlash. They are now no longer afraid of any backlash which is why they are becoming more and more aggressive about they things they say and do.

    Like

  10. Pingback: In The Mailbox: 08.30.18 : The Other McCain

  11. Batti

    those who possess half a brain and a modicum of situational awareness, are looking around at Australia’s out of control diversity with a growing sense of unease. As well they should. Implicit in this objection is the argument that the invader is of a better quality than the original inhabitant, thereby rendering the takeover and subversion of the original nation and its people acceptable due to the superiority of the incoming replacements.

    Like

  12. Batti

    Thank you for this post. I think it is an important one and helped me to crystallise my thoughts on this topic.

    I used to tell myself that if immigrants are intelligent, industrious, law abiding, self-sufficient and in all respects good citizens making a contribution to the economy of the nation then all was well, no problem. And if they intermarry, as some occasionally do, then all the better. But I had an uneasy feeling that this was not thoroughly thought out.

    It was a shock to me when I attended the graduation ceremony for my son a couple of years back when he received his degree in a field of biological science. At this ceremony, as I read down the list of names in the booklet I was astonished. I later counted up the figures and found a total of about 345 in the science faculty. Of these about 110 had European surnames, so only about a third. A similar trend is shown in other faculties, but not in the arts & social sciences where the reverse appears to hold!

    As you write: “those who possess half a brain and a modicum of situational awareness, are looking around at Australia’s out of control diversity with a growing sense of unease. As well they should. Implicit in this objection is the argument that the invader is of a better quality than the original inhabitant, thereby rendering the takeover and subversion of the original nation and its people acceptable due to the superiority of the incoming replacements.”

    If the trend continues (and I acknowledge that some of those graduating will return to their home nations), these “better quality” immigrants will make up the bulk of our doctors, lawyers, scientists, engineers and other professionals and the descendants of we incumbents will be baristas, hairdressers, waiters, mechanics and garbos. We need to wake up.

    Love your site. If only I had had access to your ideas when I was in my twenties. I would have done things a lot differently!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.