The cult of nice.

Recently on my way to work my car radio had a spastic attack and instead of fine New Orleans jazz it began pumping out some NPR-style shtick, to whit an interview with two fags who were among the very first to get married in the USA under the marriage equality Act laws brought in under Obama. Apparently their story has been interred in The Smithsonian museum. How nice for them.

The female interviewer was so enthusiastic about their story that her words dripped honey through the airwaves. The two men spoke about their wonderful day getting married in a church, with their proud and happy children by their sides, as the female pastor joyfully pronounced them husband and err … husband. It was at this point that carefully orchestrated music began underpinning the scene, and one could feel the warmth and happiness oozing from the speakers as the segment came to its finale in a manner which would have given even the good folks at lake Wobegun pause for extra introspection.

It is, of course, nothing but demented propaganda.

A man marrying another man openly in a church, by a female pastor, while their collective children of two marriages broken for the cult of sodomy look on and are told over and over again by all concerned that what is happening is wonderful and pure. It doesn’t sound very nice to me.

Which is why proponents of the homosexual agenda must underpin at every opportunity that they are the happy and nice people. They are the openhearted ones. They only have the simple desire to be welcome and inclusive to all. Why, they have even co-opted the rainbow flag as a symbol of their universality and inclusiveness, a blasphemy in of itself seeing as the rainbow was God’s symbol to Noah that He would not exterminate all of humanity for their crimes.

This constant message that homosexuals are so nice and good and pure is both an attempt to mask their real nature while at the same time laying the groundwork for their general acceptance into our communities at every level.

Now in the USA events are moving to next stage homo, with the introduction of a bill that is known as the Equality Act.

LGBTQ enforcer and homosexual Democrat congressman David Cicilline is sponsor of the Equality Act. Cicilline’s evil bill is the most aggressive assault on our constitutional religious liberties in U.S. History. The Equality Act is fully supported by house Democrats. If the Equality Act becomes the law of the land, every outrageous tyrannical demand in LBGTQ enforcer Steve Warren’s 1987 article will become reality.

The 1987 article referred to has this to say, among other demands, demands once considered outrageous and beyond the pale. 30 years later and it is outrageous and beyond the pale not to believe in them with great public enthusiasm.

“Henceforth, homosexuality will be spoken of in your churches and synagogues as an “honorable estate.”

“You can either let us marry people of the same sex, or better yet abolish marriage altogether. You will be expected to offer ceremonies that bless our sexual arrangements…You will also instruct your people in homosexual as well as heterosexual behavior, and you will go out of your way to make certain that homosexual youths are allowed to date, attend religious functions together, openly display affection, and enjoy each others sexuality without embarrassment or guilt.

If any of the older people in your midst object, you will deal with them sternly, making certain they renounce their ugly and ignorant homophobia or suffer public humiliation.

You will also make certain that laws are passed forbidding discrimination against homosexuals and heavy punishments are assessed….

Finally, we will in all likelihood, want to expunge a number of passages from your Scriptures and rewrite others, eliminating preferential treatment of marriage and using words that will allow for homosexual interpretation of passages describing biblical lovers such as Ruth and Boaz or Solomon and the Queen of Sheba.

Warning: If all these things do not come to pass quickly, we will subject Orthodox Jews and Christians to the most sustained hatred and vilification in recent memory.

We have captured the liberal establishment and the press. We have already beaten you on a number of battlefields.

You have neither the faith nor the strength to fight us, so you might as well surrender now.”

Homosexuals do not want equality at all. What they want is to be better than everyone else, to be morally purer than those whom they refer to as ‘breeders’. The Labor party that were recently defeated in the Australian Federal election intended to immediately introduce hate speech laws that would have criminalized any criticism of homosexuals.

The gay lobby desire nothing less than to become the ruling caste by merit of where they chose to stick their private parts. Which makes them technically public parts seeing as there is nothing private anymore about the homosexual lifestyle.

The cult of nice exists because it is the easiest way to subjugate the general population. If you underpin a degenerate activity with the lie that it is good and wholesome and then project that same goodness on to those who are willing to accept its existence, then people get a free pass of public morality simply for putting up with what was once seen as criminal sinful behavior. In other words, if you buy into the cult of nice then that makes you nice by default. It is thus no coincidence that homosexuals have co-opted the Church in their campaign seeing as Christianity was how our culture previously provided people with public morality. The Church has rolled over not simply to “get with the times” but because they figured it was their only way to survive, albeit a survival which is more and more looking like a short term one.

Notice that one particular aspect of that manifesto did not come to pass; the Jewish Orthodoxy has suffered no damage from the homosexual war on heterosexuals. That’s because the Jews took these threats seriously back when the homosexual train began to gather steam. There have been no changes to Jewish Orthodoxy or the way in which they follow their religion under the relentless push for diversity and equality. Jews have a very strong ethnic identity because it is the reason that they have persisted as a marginalized group over the centuries. So they understand what is at stake when core religious and societal fundamentals are attacked, let alone changed or altered. They have emerged from this debacle not merely unscathed, but stronger.

Or so they believe. As The Z Man notes, the Jews have been rather dependent on Christianity as a whole.

Jews probably would not exist at all, if not for Christendom. They adapted to being a guest population, by combining a strong ethnic identity with a willingness to adapt to the conditions of the host population.

Up to a point. The cult of nice was a step too far and underscored the inherent brittleness of the Catholic Church and its inability to retain power in the midst of great social changes. The Church’s desperation to retain some form of relevance and by default power at any cost has resulted in calamity for religion in the West. The homosexual assault on anything normal is merely a symptom of this, albeit a most visual one. Homosexuals have nowhere to go but forward as to stop and consolidate would expose their own inherent falsity. That such an obvious falsity manages to remain open and unchallenged merely underscores the precarious foundation upon which the West sits.

In other words, everything is connected. You cannot close your curtains and hide behind the convenient excuse that people should be free to do whatever they want as long as it does not harm anyone else. Such thinking is dangerously and hopelessly naive. Remember that the next time you turn on your car radio.

H/T to Gunner for the title of this piece.

14 thoughts on “The cult of nice.

  1. Yep. Never try to appease the LGBTQX lobby. The men of Sodom groped for the door to pursue their homosexual desires even AFTER God blinded them*. Does anyone really think the Leftists, including the “Christian” Leftists, are going to give up easily?

    *Genesis 19:11 And they struck with blindness the men who were at the entrance of the house, both small and great, so that they wore themselves out groping for the door.

    Like

      1. Oh, didn’t you know that there were about five percent of the Jewish voters who voted Republican? That gives the eGOP hope that in 2175 that number will rise to twenty-five percent!: Oh, then what worlds we Republicans will conquer!

        Like

  2. “Finally, we will in all likelihood, want to expunge a number of passages from your Scriptures and rewrite others, eliminating preferential treatment of marriage and using words that will allow for homosexual interpretation of passages describing biblical lovers such as Ruth and Boaz or Solomon and the Queen of Sheba.”

    They should try that with the ‘religion of peace’ handbook

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Michael F Adams

    My parish, a Continuing Anglican one, lost a family a few months ago. I had thought that their autistic daughter was making it difficult to attend church. (Too many stimuli, etc.) I was talking about them to a newer member of the parish, who, as it happens, grew up in the same Continuing Anglican parish in Dallas as the departees. (We are in Austin, TX) Someone overheard us and told me that the reason for that family’s leaving was not what I had supposed, but our, and especially, our rector’s, opposition to homosexuality. The dearly departed, you see, are Democrats, unlike most of the parish.

    As I continued my conversation with the newer guy, I said,”Cute younger guys, especially those of smaller and less threatening stature, seem to draw an unhealthy attention from the Sodomite crowd.” In the way of such conversations, the younger man just said a terse, “Yes.”

    The various churches have usually opposed homosexuality, since the days when it was still known by its earlier name, Paederasty, and with good reason.It’s predatory. I know, personally, of a Belgian family who left the Catholic church because the father of that family was molested by priests. If I know of one such case, from five or more thousand miles away, it’s rather like finding a needle in a haystack. If you find one, chances are very good that that stack is full of needles. I realize that Rousseau and Communism have played big roles in the decline of European Catholicism. However, I can see the outline of another elephant in the nave, butt-fucking priests. Whatever charity may motivate us to do, or to change in our behavior, in our misguided efforts to accommodate them, they are still our enemies, and will remain so until they have destroyed us, or died trying. (God willing)

    If you are in Louisiana, come on over to TX and visit us.

    Like

  4. 370H55V

    The good news is that the Equality Act is DOA in the Senate, and even if it passed there it would be vetoed by President Trump. Also, there is significant opposition from a sizeable chunk of the Left, including the ACLU and “trans-exclusionary radical feminists” (TERFs)–cis-women who hold large chunks of trans-women as gaming the system to take advantage of the new privileges accorded to women today.

    The bad news is that the American public is quite OK with all of this. We elect the likes of Menendez, Ellison, Sinema, et al. and I am convinced that there is no idea too looney for the likes of average Americans to embrace in order to appear “enlightened”.

    The Left is the majority opinion in America today, but it is not content only with that status. It intends to be the only opinion permissible of being expressed, with the penalty for dissent being loss of livelihood, denial of internet and financial services, and even violent reprisal. I don’t see how this ends without violent pushback as well.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Pingback: In a time of relevant lies, be irrelevant. – Dark Brightness

  6. Someone

    What’s annoying is that it’s a vocal left wing group of homos always doing the bitching and aligning themselves with human waste like Hildebeast or any other Democrat. The right wing gays mostly do their thing and don’t shove their homoness in your face. Justin Ramaindo of Anti War.com and Jack Donovan come to mind.

    But if gays are going to persist, I’m to the point I don’t care about their alleged rights since they don’t care about mine. All this bill would do is further agitate most Americans and as a consumer I certainly don’t want to see any more sexually repulsive dyke females with ugly tattoos and body piercings. I find the transweirdo thing rather off putting and would not work around such people.

    Like

  7. When I was much younger I remember the Mormon church being mocked as a cult. One piece of evidence was their abandonment of polygamy as a tenet. People in the Christian church would point out how “convenient” it was that God had told them to abandon polygamy right about the time that the church was under attack for its beliefs.

    Now try to find people in the Christian church who condemn homosexuality. It’s almost like God “conveniently” told them not to believe that part of the bible anymore.

    Don’t get me started on headship or the role of women in the church and family.

    Like

    1. There are a good many of us that condemn homosexuality for the sin it is. The lying media doesn’t wish to report such things, so they report the so-called “evangelical left,” which does not exist, regardless of what they call themselves.

      Like

  8. Pingback: In The Mailbox: 05.23.19 (Morning Edition) : The Other McCain

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.